Online Learning Blog

Other Humanities Blogs.
Why Wasting Your Own Time is Amoral

Why Wasting Your Own Time is Amoral

If you’re parents and teachers aren’t enough to get you to stop wasting your own time, maybe the moral theories of three separate philosophical schools of thought might.

The Aristotelian Approach

The first one I will discuss is the Aristotelian approach, created by Aristotle. One if its foundations is the concept of a telos. While there isn’t a perfect English translation, it roughly means end, goal, perfection, or purpose. For example, a pen’s telos would be to write. If it achieves its telos, it’s a “good” pen. If it doesn’t, it’s a “bad” pen. Aristotle said when you achieve your telos, you’re “flourishing.” He also said it’s wrong to prevent others from flourishing as well (that’s a contradiction in some situations, but I won’t get into that here) But a telos can also be rather controversial when applied to living organisms because only a human can create and apply a telos. So, what’s stopping someone from saying a cow’s telos is only to become milk and beef for consumption (we already have). Or, even worse, decide that their own telos is to control or abuse other people. When used reasonably, however, a self-applied telos can be extremely helpful.

Now, ask yourself: “What’s my own telos.” I’m sure most of you are high-aiming individuals, as you should be. So, for example, your telos (your goal, essentially) might be to get into a prestigious university or to become a doctor (I know, very generic examples). Then, whatever your telos may be, ask yourself: “Am I doing what I need to in order to achieve my telos, and flourish?” Also ask yourself: “Are my actions preventing others from achieving their telos?” If you answered yes to both (and please don’t cheat by saying your telos is to be happy, and watching television 12 hours a day makes me happy), you’re doing fine.  If not, maybe it’s time to change your habits to help yourself, and others. Laziness could prevent your parents’ from achieving their telos of creating a successful and happy family. It could also help prevent society from achieving its own telos of functioning properly. So, according to Aristotle, wasting your own time is a detriment to yourself and those surrounding you.

The Kantian Approach

German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, said that a “good” action come from its good will, not its consequence. From this only, you could very easily justify laziness. But, of course, there is much more to the Kantian approach. Kant also said that you must respect the rationality of others and he laid out four rules that, if followed, ensure that you will, but in this case we need only two.  The first, called the Formula of Humanity, says that we have a moral obligation to treat “rational agents [all humans, including yourself] as ends in themselves and never as mere means.” In other words, we can’t take advantage or abuse other people (ex: slavery is wrong). We also can’t waste the rationality within ourselves. So, according to Kant and his Formula of Humanity, suicide and laziness are both wrong. In both cases we are eliminating any chance of helping society, and ourselves.

Kant’s other rule is called the Formula of Universal Law. Simply, it says that if everyone on Earth did exactly what you’re doing and it turns out to be unsustainable, whatever you’re doing is morally unjustified. For example, imagine what would happen if everyone lied, murdered, and stole? It would be unsustainable; everyone would be paranoid or dead and there would be nothing left to steal. Or if everyone committed suicide… (Obviously the opposite is true as well; being honest, helpful and kind are all very sustainable) Also ask yourself what would happen if everyone was lazy? Food and water will be scarce within weeks and society will collapse afterwards. Billions could die. So, according to the Kantian approach, laziness is extremely wrong.


Utilitarianism is a rather basic concept, but it was developed into a philosophical theory by Jeremy Bentham. Its concept is that the best action is the action that makes the most people the most happy. It’s a nice idea, but Bentham tried to quantify it (he actually created a point system). We all know happiness and numbers don’t mix well. So I’d like to skip over Bentham and move on to John Stuart Mills. The primary reason I mentioned Bentham is because he, and John’s father, both raised John to be the “perfect philosopher.” Obviously Bentham had a huge influence on John, but fortunately John did away with the point system. He also expanded upon the original idea of Utilitarianism. He defined two types of pleasures, high and low. High pleasures (long-term) are feelings of satisfaction after you pass a test, complete a diet, or finishing an article for Learn By Cam. Low pleasures (short-term) are the feelings of satisfaction after eating candy, playing video games, or procrastinating on work. We need a balance of both to be happy, but Mills says that attaining higher pleasures will create much more happiness. It should be clear where I’m going with this, so I’ll keep it short. Just two points: One, doing meaningful and hard work will make you happier in the long run than being lazy. And two, being lazy is selfish as others need to bear the extra burden caused by your laziness; only you’re happy, but everyone else is not as happy as they could be, this is wrong in the Utilitarian approach.

So, it looks like laziness is wrong… Need I say anymore?

P.S. – Taken word for word, all three of these philosophical theories are completely impractical. Understanding and applying the best of each, however, can be extremely helpful. They also don’t take non-humans into account (or when they do it’s to justify their inferiority). Fortunately, many modern philosophers have found clever ways to reinterpret these theories to actually justify fair treatment of non-humans.

P.S.S. – I’d like to thank my professor Zack Knorr for teaching me pretty much all I know about philosophy.

Why Humans Are Animals Too

Why Humans Are Animals Too

Humankind have a superiority complex. Many believe that we have the right, as people, to divide behaviour into 'Natural' and 'Unnatural' categories, yet at the same time we are always trying profusely to distinguish ourselves from nature.

Yes, it may be true that we as Homo sapiens are top of the food chain, but we are still part of it! Modern cultural figures such as 'Mother Nature' are presented as human in form due to the (often unconscious) notion that we are superior over nature. Despite this division between (Wo)man and beast however, any behaviour that a human commits that is considered deviant to the norm is suddenly labelled as 'Unnatural'.

Evidence of the superiority complex mentioned is the fact that we keep animals in zoos. Is the purpose of the 'Zoo' solely to capture the interest and imagination of visitors, or is it in fact a self-affirmation of our omnipotence? Human beings, whether we like it or not, are animals. Everything that is 'Man-made' is therefore in reality originally a product of nature, and isn't really 'Man-made' at all.

The reason I bring this topic up is because of how commonly the "It's not natural" argument is used today. When there is no credibility behind a point this is an easy-enough standpoint to adopt. In the area of LGBT rights, for example. Due to the fact that some people see anything that isn't heterosexual as wrong, they label it unnatural, despite the fact that humans are in fact the only species of animal that demonize other members of their species for their sexual preferences.

We have to accept that we are part of nature and therefore everything is effectively natural. We're not omnipotent overseers that can define what is natural and what isn't. Global Warming and even the recent floods in Britain are demonstrative of this. It may be angering that we're just animals, but at least it's the truth.

Teach Ethics, Moral Philosophy Online Using Skype

Teach Ethics, Moral Philosophy Online Using Skype

Are you passionate about Philosophy? Perhaps you have studied some of the Classical Philosophers such as; Plato, Aristotle or the latter works, theories and doctrines of John Locke, David Hume, John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham, Immanuel Kant or Ludwig Wittgenstein. Are you able to help others with essay or dissertation writing and exam preparation? If the answer is yes, then you could be exactly what we are looking for. We need people who are interested in teaching and passing on their knowledge of Ethics and Moral Philosophy to others.

If you know the difference between Bentham & Mill's "Principle of Utility" and Kant's "Categorical Imperative", or understand the importance of Moral Relativism, or what makes an act morally "right" or "wrong", then your experience could be just what others are looking for. You do not necessarily have to be an Emeritus Doctor of Philosophy with 30 years experience at Oxford or Cambridge University to teach online with us. The most important factor is that you are knowledgeable and passionate about Moral Philosophy and Ethics. Your knowledge is invaluable and could also earn you an additional income.

We have made it very easy for you to share and teach your knowledge of Ethics and Moral Philosophy online with other people. All you need to get started is a computer, webcam and internet access, so you do not have to be some "technical guru". Not only is it free to register but you can choose the hours you wish to work and charge any amount between $US10 and $US100 per lesson you teach. As lessons take place using our Virtual Classroom or Skype, you can work from the safety and comfort of your home or office. Using Skype to teach online works really well and can be great fun.

If you are interested in learning more and sharing your knowledge of Ethics and Moral Philosophy with others, then click on the following link - Teach Ethics, Moral Philosophy Online Via Skype

Page 1 of 1


  Index Of Blogs

  View Our Team Of Authors

   Online Learning Blog - RSS Feed

  Select Language...

Online Lernen Blog    Online Learning Blog    Blog de aprendizaje en línea    Blog d'apprentissage en ligne    Online belajar blog

Blog Di Apprendimento On-line    Online leren Blog    Online Nauki Blog    Blog de aprendizagem on-line    在线学习博客

Translated versions of this blog provided by Microsoft
Bing,are available by clicking on the flags above.

Blog Archive

Popular posts

New Tutors

Latest Tweets